Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 59 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 4.4.2, 4.1.1, 4.0.4 | -- |
| 2012-09-05 | 2018-10-18 |
| 4.82 x 2.40 x 0.33 inches | 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches |
| 4.44 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Black, Pink and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 165.00 | $ 157.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.3 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 540 x 960 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Advanced | P-OLED |
| 256 pixels per inch | 439 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8960 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Krait (Dual-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB (500 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 225 (400 MHz) GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.37 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| -- | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 1.32 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 0.30 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 6.27 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.2 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2000mAh Li-Ion Battery | 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 408 hours standby time 10.5 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.92 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3 has a global score of 80, which is much better than the Motorola DROID RAZR M's general score of 59. The Google Pixel 3 construction is notably newer and a little bit thinner, but somewhat heavier than the Motorola DROID RAZR M. Google Pixel 3 counts with just a bit better looking display than Motorola DROID RAZR M, because it has a much better 1080 x 2160px resolution, a way greater display density and a bigger display.
Google Pixel 3 has a very superior memory capacity to install games and applications than Motorola DROID RAZR M, although it has no slot for SD memory cards. The Google Pixel 3 has a greater processing power than Motorola DROID RAZR M, because although it has doesn't have an additional GPU, it also counts with a greater amount of RAM and a higher number of faster cores.
Google Pixel 3 counts with a really longer battery lifetime than Motorola DROID RAZR M, because it has a 2915mAh battery capacity against 2000mAh. Google Pixel 3 captures much clearer photos and videos than Motorola DROID RAZR M, because it has a way better 12.2 megapixels resolution camera and a lot higher 3840x2160 video quality.
Even being the best phone in our current comparison, Google Pixel 3 is also cheaper, which makes buying this phone a simple decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.