Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 59 | 78.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 4.4.2, 4.1.1, 4.0.4 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2012-09-05 | 2019-05-07 |
| 4.82 x 2.40 x 0.33 inches | 6.30 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches |
| 4.44 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Black, Purple and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 165.00 | $ 167.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.3 inches | 6 inches |
| 540 x 960 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Advanced | OLED |
| 256 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8960 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| Krait (Dual-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB (500 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 225 (400 MHz) GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 8.37 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| -- | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 1.32 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 0.30 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 6.27 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.2 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2000mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 408 hours standby time 10.5 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.92 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3a XL is way better than Motorola DROID RAZR M, having a 78.9 score against 59. These devices come with Android OS, but Google Pixel 3a XL has older 11 version while Motorola DROID RAZR M has Android 4.4.2 version. The Google Pixel 3a XL is a extremely newer and a little bit thinner device than Motorola DROID RAZR M, but it is a lot heavier.
The Google Pixel 3a XL counts with a little faster CPU than Motorola DROID RAZR M, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics processing unit, it also counts with 3 GB more RAM and a larger number of cores. Google Pixel 3a XL has a bit better screen than Motorola DROID RAZR M, because it has a way higher pixels number per display inch, a lot larger display and a way higher 1080 x 2160 resolution.
Google Pixel 3a XL captures much better photographs and videos than Motorola DROID RAZR M, because it has a much higher 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a back camera with lot more MP. Google Pixel 3a XL has much more memory for apps and games than Motorola DROID RAZR M, although it has no external memory slot.
The Google Pixel 3a XL features a superior battery lifetime than Motorola DROID RAZR M, because it has an 85% more battery size.
The Google Pixel 3a XL is a little more expensive than Motorola DROID RAZR M, but it's still a good choice, because you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.