Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 59 | 64.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Nokia |
| Android 4.4.2, 4.1.1, 4.0.4 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2012-09-05 | 2019-06-10 |
| 4.82 x 2.40 x 0.33 inches | 6.01 x 2.83 x 0.37 inches |
| 4.44 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Black |
| -- | Metal and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 165.00 | $ 90.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.3 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 540 x 960 pixels | 1440 x 720 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Advanced | IPS LCD |
| 256 pixels per inch | 293 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8960 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 429 SDM429 chipset |
| Krait (Dual-Core 1500 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Quad-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB (500 MHz) RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| Adreno 225 (400 MHz) GPU | Adreno 504 GPU |
| 8.37 | 8.73 |
| Storage | |
| -- | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 1.32 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 0.30 MP | 8.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.00 aperture |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 6.27 | 8.47 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.2 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2000mAh Li-Ion Battery | 2990mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 408 hours standby time 10.5 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Nokia 3.1 A is a little bit better than Motorola DROID RAZR M, having a general score of 64.8 against 59. Nokia 3.1 A's construction is noticeably newer, but somewhat heavier and somewhat thicker than the Motorola DROID RAZR M. Both of these devices come with Android operating system, but Nokia 3.1 A has a newer 9.0 Pie version and Motorola DROID RAZR M has Android 4.4.2 version, so it provides the user some extra features.
The Nokia 3.1 A has a bit better processing power than Motorola DROID RAZR M, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics co-processor, it also counts with more RAM memory and a greater number of cores (and faster). The Motorola DROID RAZR M features a little sharper screen than Nokia 3.1 A, although it has a much lower resolution of 960 x 540, a lot smaller display and a bit lower display pixel density.
The Nokia 3.1 A counts with a very superior memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola DROID RAZR M, because it has an external memory slot that supports up to 128 GB. Nokia 3.1 A features a lot better camera than Motorola DROID RAZR M. Both of them have the same video definition, the same video frame rate and the same resolution back camera.
Nokia 3.1 A has a much longer battery performance than Motorola DROID RAZR M, because it has 2990mAh of battery capacity.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones we compare here, the Nokia 3.1 A is also by far the cheapest one, making it a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.