Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 59 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 4.4.2, 4.1.1, 4.0.4 | -- |
| 2012-09-05 | 2018-03-16 |
| 4.82 x 2.40 x 0.33 inches | 5.81 x 2.70 x 0.33 inches |
| 4.44 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Burgundy red, Coral blue, Ice blue, Lilac purple, Midnight black, Sunrise gold and Titanium gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 165.00 | $ 158.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.3 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 540 x 960 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Advanced | Super AMOLED |
| 256 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8960 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Krait (Dual-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB (500 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 225 (400 MHz) GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.37 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| -- | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 1.32 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 0.30 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 6.27 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.2 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2000mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 408 hours standby time 10.5 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S9 has a general score of 83.3, which is way better than Motorola DROID RAZR M's overall score of 59. Galaxy S9's construction has the same thickness than the Motorola DROID RAZR M, but it's extremely heavier. The Samsung Galaxy S9 features a much better looking display than Motorola DROID RAZR M, because it has a much better resolution of 1440 x 2960 pixels, a way bigger screen and a lot better number of pixels per inch of screen.
The Galaxy S9 has a much bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola DROID RAZR M, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that admits up to 400 GB. The Galaxy S9 features a better performing CPU than Motorola DROID RAZR M, because although it has doesn't have an extra GPU, it also counts with 6 more cores and a higher amount of RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy S9 features a much longer battery life than Motorola DROID RAZR M, because it has a 3000mAh battery size. Samsung Galaxy S9 has a lot better camera than Motorola DROID RAZR M, because it has a much higher 3840x2160 video quality and a camera with much more mega pixels.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones we compare here, the Galaxy S9 is also the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.