Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 66.2 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| Android 4.4.2, 4.1, 4.0.4 | Android 10 |
| 2012-09-05 | 2020-05-05 |
| 5.19 x 2.67 x 0.37 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.54 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Black and White | Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 300.00 | $ 291.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 312 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8960 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| Krait (Dual-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB (500 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 225 (400 MHz) GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 8.37 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.12 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 1.30 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.40 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.26 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.2 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li-Ion Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 372 hours standby time 21 hours talk time | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a global score of 81.1, which is much better than the Motorola DROID RAZR MAXX HD's overall score of 66.2. Both devices we are comparing here work with Android OS (Operating System), but Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has an older 10 version and Motorola DROID RAZR MAXX HD has Android 4.4.2 version. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro's body is notably newer and a little bit thinner than the Motorola DROID RAZR MAXX HD's, although it's also a lot heavier.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a better processing power than Motorola DROID RAZR MAXX HD, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics processing unit, it also counts with 5 GB more RAM and a greater number of cores (and also faster). The Motorola DROID RAZR MAXX HD has a slightly better screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, although it has a bit lower display density, a lot lower resolution of 1280 x 720 pixels and a really smaller display.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro counts with a very superior memory for applications and games than Motorola DROID RAZR MAXX HD, because it has a SD extension slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB and more internal memory. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a greater camera than Motorola DROID RAZR MAXX HD, because it has a way larger aperture, a way higher (4K) video quality and a much better 64 mega-pixels resolution camera in the back.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro features a much better battery duration than Motorola DROID RAZR MAXX HD, because it has a 5020mAh battery capacity.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones we are comparing here, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro is also the cheapest one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.