Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 64.3 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 4.1.2, 4.0, 2.3.6, 2.3.5 | -- |
| 2012-01-09 | 2018-10-18 |
| 5.15 x 2.71 x 0.35 inches | 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| -- | Black, Pink and White |
| Kevlar | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 150.00 | $ 157.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.3 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 540 x 960 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 256 pixels per inch | 439 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.4 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| TI OMAP4430 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A9 (Dual-Core 1200 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR SGX540 (Dual-Core 304 MHz) GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.28 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 5.72 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 1.30 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.40 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.25 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 379 hours standby time 21.5 hours talk time | -- |
| 5.28 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3 has a score of 80, which is a lot better than Motorola Droid RAZR MAXX's 64.3 global score. Even though Google Pixel 3 is a little bit heavier than Motorola Droid RAZR MAXX, it's somewhat thinner and notably newer. The Google Pixel 3 features a sharper screen than Motorola Droid RAZR MAXX, because it has a lot better count of pixels per display inch, a bigger display and a much higher resolution of 1080 x 2160 pixels.
Google Pixel 3 has a faster CPU than Motorola Droid RAZR MAXX, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics co-processor, it also counts with 3 GB more RAM and a larger number of cores (and also faster). Google Pixel 3 captures better photos and videos than Motorola Droid RAZR MAXX, because it has a lot better video quality, a back camera with much more mega pixels and a much bigger aperture for better photography and video in low light situations.
The Google Pixel 3 has much more storage for games and applications than Motorola Droid RAZR MAXX, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 48 GB more internal storage capacity. Motorola Droid RAZR MAXX counts with a bit better battery life than Google Pixel 3, because it has a 13 percent greater battery size.
Google Pixel 3 costs a bit more money than Motorola Droid RAZR MAXX, but you can get a much better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.