Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 64.3 | 78.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 4.1.2, 4.0, 2.3.6, 2.3.5 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2011-10-18 | 2019-05-07 |
| 5.15 x 2.71 x 0.28 inches | 6.30 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches |
| 4.48 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Black, Purple and White |
| Kevlar | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 169.00 | $ 167.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.3 inches | 6 inches |
| 540 x 960 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Advanced | OLED |
| 256 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| TI OMAP4430 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A9 (Dual-Core 1200 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR SGX540 (Dual-Core 304 MHz) GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 8.28 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 5.72 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 1.30 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.40 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 720 x 480 (120 fps) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.36 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1780mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 204 hours standby time 12.5 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.68 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3a XL has a global score of 78.9, which is much better than the Motorola Droid RAZR's 64.3 overall score. The Google Pixel 3a XL design is notably newer than the Motorola Droid RAZR's, but it's much heavier and somewhat thicker. Both devices in our current comparison have Android OS, but the Google Pixel 3a XL has older 11 version while Motorola Droid RAZR has Android 4.1.2.
Google Pixel 3a XL features a bit better screen than Motorola Droid RAZR, because it has a much larger screen, a lot greater display pixel density and a lot better 1080 x 2160 resolution. The Google Pixel 3a XL counts with a little bit better performance than Motorola Droid RAZR, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics co-processor, it also counts with 6 more cores and 3 GB more RAM.
Google Pixel 3a XL features a much greater memory to store more games and applications than Motorola Droid RAZR, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 48 GB more internal storage. The Google Pixel 3a XL counts with a superior camera than Motorola Droid RAZR, because it has a lot better 3840x2160 video definition, a back-facing camera with lot more MP and a lot bigger aperture to take better low-light captures and video.
The Google Pixel 3a XL counts with a much better battery life than Motorola Droid RAZR, because it has 3700mAh of battery capacity against 1780mAh.
Google Pixel 3a XL not only is the best phones of the ones we are comparing, but it's also the cheapest one, making it an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.