Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 64.3 | 69.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| Android 4.1.2, 4.0, 2.3.6, 2.3.5 | Android 10 |
| 2011-10-18 | 2020-06-12 |
| 5.15 x 2.71 x 0.28 inches | 6.29 x 3.01 x 0.34 inches |
| 4.48 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Champagne pink and Midnight blue |
| Kevlar | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 169.00 | $ 150.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.3 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 540 x 960 pixels | 1520 x 720 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Advanced | IPS LCD |
| 256 pixels per inch | 271 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| TI OMAP4430 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 SDM632 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A9 (Dual-Core 1200 MHz) processor | Kryo 250, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| PowerVR SGX540 (Dual-Core 304 MHz) GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 8.28 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 5.72 | 9.84 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 1.30 MP | 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.40 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 720 x 480 (120 fps) slow motion video | -- |
| 8.36 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1780mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 3550mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 204 hours standby time 12.5 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.68 | 5.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0, EDR | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola Moto E (2020) has a score of 69.7, which is a bit better than the Motorola Droid RAZR's 64.3 overall score. The Motorola Moto E (2020) design is a lot newer than the Motorola Droid RAZR's, although it is thicker and way heavier. Both of these phones use Android operating system, but the Motorola Moto E (2020) has the older 10 version while Motorola Droid RAZR has Android 4.1.2.
The Moto E (2020) counts with just a little better performance than Motorola Droid RAZR, because although it has doesn't have a graphics co-processor, it also counts with a greater number of cores (and also faster) and more RAM. Motorola Droid RAZR has a little sharper screen than Moto E (2020), although it has a just a little lower pixel amount in each display inch, a way worse resolution of 960 x 540 and a lot smaller screen.
The Moto E (2020) features a much bigger memory capacity to store more apps and games than Motorola Droid RAZR, because it has more internal storage and an external SD slot that admits up to 512 GB. The Motorola Moto E (2020) has a much longer battery performance than Motorola Droid RAZR, because it has a 99 percent more battery capacity.
Motorola Moto E (2020) features a better camera than Motorola Droid RAZR, and although they both have the same video definition, the Motorola Moto E (2020) also has a larger diafragm aperture, a much better 13 megapixels resolution back camera and faster video frame rates.
Moto E (2020) is not only the best phones between the ones we are comparing, but it's also a bit cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.