Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Apple |
| 2015-10-29 | 2017-09-22 |
| 5.90 x 3.07 x 0.36 inches | 6.24 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 7.13 ounces |
| Black and White | Gold, Red, Silver and Space gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | $ 949.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.4 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 544 pixels per inch | 401 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9.09 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3760mAh Battery | 2691mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.68 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone 8 Plus is much better than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, with an 87.1 score against 75.4. The iPhone 8 Plus is a newer and thinner device than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, but it's also heavier. The iPhone 8 Plus has a faster processing unit than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, because although it has lesser processing cores (although they are faster), and they both have 3 GB of RAM memory, the iPhone 8 Plus also counts with a 64-bit processing unit.
Motorola DROID Turbo 2 counts with a bit better looking display than iPhone 8 Plus, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher quantity of pixels per inch of display and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels. Apple iPhone 8 Plus has a slightly better camera than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, because although it has a lower 3840x2160 video definition and a camera with much less mega pixels resolution, it also counts with a larger camera aperture to take better photos and video in low-light situations.
Motorola DROID Turbo 2 features a bigger memory to install games and applications than Apple iPhone 8 Plus, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with an external memory slot that holds up to 1,95 TB. Motorola DROID Turbo 2 has a much better battery lifetime than Apple iPhone 8 Plus, because it has a 3760mAh battery capacity.
Although Apple iPhone 8 Plus is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Motorola DROID Turbo 2, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Motorola DROID Turbo 2. If you prefer to save some money, you can buy the Motorola DROID Turbo 2, and give up a few features and specs, but you'll get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.