Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 81.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Apple |
| -- | iOS 15.x, 14.x, 13.x |
| 2015-10-29 | 2020-04-24 |
| 5.90 x 3.07 x 0.36 inches | 5.45 x 2.65 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Black and White | Black, Red and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | $ 399.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.4 inches | 4.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1334 x 750 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 544 pixels per inch | 326 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Apple A13 Bionic APL1W85 (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | 64-bit Lightning and Thunder, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2650 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 GPU | Apple-designed 4 core GPU |
| 9.09 | 10.35 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3760mAh Battery | 1821mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.68 | 3.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone SE (2020) has a global score of 81.5, which is slightly better than the Motorola DROID Turbo 2's 75.4 general score. IPhone SE (2020)'s body is extremely newer, somewhat lighter and thinner than Motorola DROID Turbo 2. Motorola DROID Turbo 2 features a little more vivid screen than iPhone SE (2020), because it has a lot better resolution of 1440 x 2560px, a much greater display pixel density and a bit larger display.
Motorola DROID Turbo 2 features a much bigger storage to store more apps and games than iPhone SE (2020), and although they both have equal internal storage capacity, the Motorola DROID Turbo 2 also has a slot for an SD memory card that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. Apple iPhone SE (2020) has a superior performance than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, because although it has an inferior number of cores , and they both have a 3 GB RAM memory, the Apple iPhone SE (2020) also counts with a 64-bit CPU.
The Motorola DROID Turbo 2 counts with a much better battery lifetime than Apple iPhone SE (2020), because it has a 3760mAh battery size. IPhone SE (2020) captures slightly better photographs and videos than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, because although it has a way lower resolution camera in the back and a lower 3840x2160 video definition, it also counts with a bigger aperture.
Although iPhone SE (2020) is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Motorola DROID Turbo 2, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Motorola DROID Turbo 2. If you want to save some dollars, you can buy the Motorola DROID Turbo 2, letting go some specs and features, but you'll get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.