Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 82 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Apple |
| 2015-10-29 | 2018-10-26 |
| 5.90 x 3.07 x 0.36 inches | 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Black and White | Black, Blue, Red, Rose gold, White and Yellow |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.4 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1792 x 828 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 544 pixels per inch | 324 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9.09 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3760mAh Battery | 2942mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.68 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone XR has an overall score of 82, which is a little bit better than Motorola DROID Turbo 2's overall score of 75.4. The iPhone XR is a way newer and just a little thinner phone than the Motorola DROID Turbo 2, but it is also somewhat heavier. IPhone XR features a faster CPU than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, because although it has less CPU cores , and they both have the same RAM amount, the iPhone XR also counts with a 64-bit processing unit.
The Motorola DROID Turbo 2 has a little sharper screen than iPhone XR, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a much higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px and much more pixels per screen inch. The iPhone XR captures just a bit better videos and photos than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, because although it has a back camera with way less mega-pixels resolution and a worse 3840x2160 video definition, it also counts with a larger aperture to take better photography and video in low light environments.
Motorola DROID Turbo 2 has a very superior storage capacity for games and applications than iPhone XR, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal storage capacity, the Motorola DROID Turbo 2 also has a SD card slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. Motorola DROID Turbo 2 features improved battery life than Apple iPhone XR, because it has 3760mAh of battery capacity against 2942mAh.
Although iPhone XR is a better device, it is way more expensive than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Motorola DROID Turbo 2. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can buy Motorola DROID Turbo 2, and give up a few features and specs, but you will get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.