Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 77.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Asus |
| 2015-10-29 | 2018-10-29 |
| 5.90 x 3.07 x 0.36 inches | 6.25 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Black and White | Black |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.4 inches | 6 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 544 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| -- | 550 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 3.63 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3760mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.68 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Asus ROG Phone is a little bit better than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, getting a global score of 77.1 against 75.4. Even though the Asus ROG Phone is somewhat heavier than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, it's a bit thinner and also notably newer. Motorola DROID Turbo 2 has a little bit better looking display than Asus ROG Phone, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with more pixels per screen inch and a better 1440 x 2560px resolution.
Asus ROG Phone counts with just a little better performance than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Asus ROG Phone also has more RAM. The Asus ROG Phone features a much better storage capacity to store more apps and games than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with more internal storage.
The Motorola DROID Turbo 2 captures a lot better photographs and videos than Asus ROG Phone, although it has a smaller camera aperture which is worse for low light captures and worse 30 frames per second video frame rates, they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition. Asus ROG Phone features a bit better battery performance than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, because it has a 6% larger battery size.
Although Asus ROG Phone is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Motorola DROID Turbo 2, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Motorola DROID Turbo 2. So if you want that extra features, you can buy the Asus ROG Phone, else you can save some dollars and buy the Motorola DROID Turbo 2, giving up some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.