Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| -- | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2015-10-29 | 2019-05-07 |
| 5.90 x 3.07 x 0.36 inches | 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 5.19 ounces |
| Black and White | Black, Purple and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | $ 186.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.4 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 544 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3760mAh Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.68 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3a has a general score of 78.8, which is slightly better than the Motorola DROID Turbo 2's 75.4 overall score. The Google Pixel 3a is a notably newer device, and it's also lighter and somewhat thinner than the Motorola DROID Turbo 2. The Motorola DROID Turbo 2 has a little sharper display than Google Pixel 3a, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 and a just a little greater pixels amount per inch of screen.
The Google Pixel 3a counts with a processor that's just as good as the processing unit in Motorola DROID Turbo 2, and although the Google Pixel 3a has a higher amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. The Motorola DROID Turbo 2 counts with a lot bigger storage capacity to install games and applications than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory, the Motorola DROID Turbo 2 also has a slot for external memory cards that allows up to 1,95 TB.
Motorola DROID Turbo 2 has improved battery duration than Google Pixel 3a, because it has 3760mAh of battery capacity. The Google Pixel 3a and Motorola DROID Turbo 2 both have similar cameras, because although the Google Pixel 3a has a much lower 12.2 mega pixels resolution camera and a worse (4K) video quality, it also counts with a larger aperture to capture better captures and videos in poorly lited environments.
Although Google Pixel 3a is a better device, it costs more than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Motorola DROID Turbo 2. If you are trying to save some dollars, you can get the Motorola DROID Turbo 2, letting go a few features and specifications, but you'll get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.