Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| 2015-10-29 | 2019-10-24 |
| 5.90 x 3.07 x 0.36 inches | 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Black and White | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.4 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 544 pixels per inch | 443 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3760mAh Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.68 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4 is a little bit better than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, getting a overall score of 81.9 against 75.4. The Google Pixel 4 is a a lot newer cellphone, and it is also somewhat thinner and a bit lighter than Motorola DROID Turbo 2. Motorola DROID Turbo 2 features a little more vivid screen than Google Pixel 4, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a just a bit greater display pixel density and a better 1440 x 2560 resolution.
Google Pixel 4 features just a little better hardware performance than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Google Pixel 4 also has 3 GB more RAM. The Google Pixel 4's camera is very similar to the Motorola DROID Turbo 2 one, because although the Google Pixel 4 has a worse video definition and a way worse resolution back facing camera, it also counts with a bigger diafragm aperture.
Motorola DROID Turbo 2 counts with a very superior memory to store more games and applications than Google Pixel 4, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal storage, the Motorola DROID Turbo 2 also has a slot for SD memory cards that holds up to 1,95 TB. Motorola DROID Turbo 2 features superior battery performance than Google Pixel 4, because it has a 3760mAh battery size.
Although Google Pixel 4 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Motorola DROID Turbo 2, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Motorola DROID Turbo 2. So if you need that extra features, you can buy the Google Pixel 4, otherwise you can save a couple dollars and buy the Motorola DROID Turbo 2, giving up some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.