Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| 2015-10-29 | 2019-10-24 |
| 5.90 x 3.07 x 0.36 inches | 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| Black and White | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | $ 487.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.4 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 544 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3760mAh Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.68 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4 XL is just a bit better than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, having a general score of 82.9 against 75.4. The Google Pixel 4 XL design is newer and somewhat thinner, but also somewhat heavier than the Motorola DROID Turbo 2. The Google Pixel 4 XL counts with a slightly better display than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, because although it has a little worse quantity of pixels per screen inch, it also counts with a bigger screen and a bit higher 1440 x 3040px resolution.
Motorola DROID Turbo 2 features a much bigger storage to store more apps and games than Google Pixel 4 XL, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal storage capacity, the Motorola DROID Turbo 2 also has a slot for an SD memory card that holds up to 1,95 TB. The Google Pixel 4 XL features a bit faster processor than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Google Pixel 4 XL also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
The Google Pixel 4 XL and Motorola DROID Turbo 2 both have quite similar battery durations, although the Google Pixel 4 XL has 3700mAh of battery capacity instead of 3760mAh. The Google Pixel 4 XL features a camera that is just as good as the Motorola DROID Turbo 2 one, because although the Google Pixel 4 XL has a lower video quality and a lot worse resolution camera, it also counts with a larger aperture.
Although Google Pixel 4 XL is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Motorola DROID Turbo 2. If you want to save some money, you can buy the Motorola DROID Turbo 2, letting go a few features and specs, but you will get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.