Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2015-10-29 | 2020-08-20 |
| 5.90 x 3.07 x 0.36 inches | 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Black and White | Just black |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | $ 349.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.4 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 544 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3760mAh Battery | 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.68 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4a is much better than the Motorola DROID Turbo 2, having a score of 82.9 against 75.4. Google Pixel 4a is a much newer cellphone, and it's also lighter and thinner than Motorola DROID Turbo 2. The Motorola DROID Turbo 2 has a bit sharper screen than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution and a quite better screen density.
The Google Pixel 4a features just a bit better performance than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Google Pixel 4a also has a higher amount of RAM memory. Motorola DROID Turbo 2 counts with a superior storage capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that holds up to 1,95 TB.
Motorola DROID Turbo 2 has longer battery performance than Google Pixel 4a, because it has a 3760mAh battery size instead of 3140mAh. The Google Pixel 4a's camera is just as good as the camera in Motorola DROID Turbo 2, because although the Google Pixel 4a has a lot lower resolution back facing camera and a worse 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, it also counts with a larger diafragm aperture for better captures and videos in low-light environments.
Although Google Pixel 4a is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Motorola DROID Turbo 2. If you prefer to save a few dollars, you can buy Motorola DROID Turbo 2, letting go a couple features and specs, but you will get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.