Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| 2015-10-29 | 2020-10-15 |
| 5.90 x 3.07 x 0.36 inches | 5.70 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 5.33 ounces |
| Black and White | Just black and Sorta sage |
| -- | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | $ 548.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.4 inches | 6 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 544 pixels per inch | 430 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.5 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3760mAh Battery | 4080mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.68 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 5 is much better than the Motorola DROID Turbo 2, with an 89 score against 75.4. The Google Pixel 5 construction is notably newer, thinner and somewhat lighter than the Motorola DROID Turbo 2. The Motorola DROID Turbo 2 counts with a bit more vivid display than Google Pixel 5, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a greater pixel amount per inch in the screen and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560px.
The Google Pixel 5 counts with a bit better CPU than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Google Pixel 5 also has a greater amount of RAM. Motorola DROID Turbo 2 has a superior memory to install games and applications than Google Pixel 5, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Google Pixel 5 takes just a bit better photographs and videos than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, because although it has a worse 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a camera with a lot worse 12.2 mega-pixels resolution, it also counts with a bigger diafragm aperture. The Google Pixel 5 features a bit better battery performance than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, because it has 4080mAh of battery capacity instead of 3760mAh.
Although Google Pixel 5 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Motorola DROID Turbo 2, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Motorola DROID Turbo 2. If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can buy Motorola DROID Turbo 2, letting go a couple features, but you'll get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.