Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | HTC |
| 2015-10-29 | 2017-02-21 |
| 5.90 x 3.07 x 0.36 inches | 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Black and White | 16 777 216 |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.4 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | S-LCD 5 |
| 544 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.09 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3760mAh Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.68 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
HTC U Ultra is slightly better than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, getting a global score of 77 against 75.4. The HTC U Ultra is a newer and thinner phone than the Motorola DROID Turbo 2, although it is also a bit heavier. Motorola DROID Turbo 2 counts with a slightly better screen than HTC U Ultra, because although it has a quite smaller screen, and they both have exactly the same 1440 x 2560 resolution, the Motorola DROID Turbo 2 also counts with a quite higher pixels density.
The HTC U Ultra's storage capacity to install games and applications is just as good as Motorola DROID Turbo 2's one, both have equal 64 GB internal memory capacity and a SD card slot that supports up to 1,95 TB. Motorola DROID Turbo 2 features a bit superior CPU than HTC U Ultra, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a larger number of cores (but slower).
HTC U Ultra takes just a bit better pictures and videos than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, because although it has a lower video definition and a back facing camera with a much lower 12 mega pixels resolution, it also counts with a bigger aperture for better low-light images and videos. The Motorola DROID Turbo 2 counts with longer battery performance than HTC U Ultra, because it has 3760mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Although HTC U Ultra is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Motorola DROID Turbo 2, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Motorola DROID Turbo 2. If you want to save a few dollars, you can get the Motorola DROID Turbo 2, and give up a few features and specifications, but you will get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.