Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Huawei |
| 2015-10-29 | 2018-10-26 |
| 5.90 x 3.07 x 0.36 inches | 6.21 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Black and White | Black, Emerald green and Twilight |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | $ 549.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 544 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | HiSilicon Kirin 980 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A76 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2600 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 GPU | Mali-G76 MP10 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 40.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3760mAh Battery | 4200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.68 | 6.08 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Huawei Mate 20 Pro is a bit better than the Motorola DROID Turbo 2, with a general score of 82.9 against 75.4. The Huawei Mate 20 Pro body is extremely newer and just a little bit thinner than Motorola DROID Turbo 2's, although it is also somewhat heavier. The Huawei Mate 20 Pro counts with a little more vivid screen than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, because although it has a little bit worse pixel number per inch in the display, it also counts with a bit higher 1440 x 3120 pixels resolution and a larger display.
The Huawei Mate 20 Pro counts with a little better processing power than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, and although they both have 8 cores, the Huawei Mate 20 Pro also has a higher amount of RAM memory. Huawei Mate 20 Pro shoots much better videos and photos than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same (4K) video definition, the Huawei Mate 20 Pro also has a larger aperture and a camera with way more MP.
The Motorola DROID Turbo 2 counts with much more memory capacity to install games and applications than Huawei Mate 20 Pro, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with an external memory slot that supports up to 1,95 TB. Huawei Mate 20 Pro counts with just a little better battery lifetime than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, because it has 4200mAh of battery capacity instead of 3760mAh.
Although Huawei Mate 20 Pro is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Motorola DROID Turbo 2, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Motorola DROID Turbo 2. So if you need that extra features, you can buy the Huawei Mate 20 Pro, but if you don't you can save a couple dollars and buy the Motorola DROID Turbo 2, letting go some specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.