Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| -- | Android 8.1 Oreo |
| 2015-10-29 | 2018-11-09 |
| 5.90 x 3.07 x 0.36 inches | 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Black and White | Black and Gray |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.4 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 544 pixels per inch | 563 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.09 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 12.76 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3760mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.68 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG G7 Fit has a global score of 77, which is a bit better than Motorola DROID Turbo 2's score of 75.4. LG G7 Fit's design is newer, somewhat thinner and a bit lighter than the Motorola DROID Turbo 2. The LG G7 Fit features a sharper screen than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, because it has a quite greater pixels density, a quite better 1440 x 3120 pixels resolution and a bit larger display.
The Motorola DROID Turbo 2 has a little bit better performance than LG G7 Fit, because although it has 1 GB lesser RAM, it also counts with more processing cores (although slower). The Motorola DROID Turbo 2 counts with a greater storage for applications and games than LG G7 Fit, and although they both have an external memory card slot that holds up to 1,95 TB, the Motorola DROID Turbo 2 also has 64 GB internal storage.
The LG G7 Fit counts with a camera that's very similar to the Motorola DROID Turbo 2 one, although the LG G7 Fit has a much worse resolution camera in the back, a tinier camera aperture and a lower 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution. The Motorola DROID Turbo 2 has longer battery duration than LG G7 Fit, because it has a 25 percent greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.