Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| 2015-10-29 | 2018-06-08 |
| 5.90 x 3.07 x 0.36 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Black and White | Black and Gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.4 inches | 6 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 544 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3760mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.68 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V35 ThinQ has a general score of 81.3, which is slightly better than the Motorola DROID Turbo 2's 75.4 overall score. The LG V35 ThinQ body is incredibly newer, somewhat thinner and just a little lighter than Motorola DROID Turbo 2. LG V35 ThinQ has a little better hardware performance than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the LG V35 ThinQ also has 3 GB more RAM.
The LG V35 ThinQ features a little sharper screen than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, because although it has a quite worse count of pixels per inch of display, it also counts with a slightly higher 1440 x 2880 resolution and a bit bigger screen. The LG V35 ThinQ has a bit better camera than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, because although it has a back-facing camera with lot less mega-pixels and a lower 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, it also counts with a larger camera aperture for better low-light images.
The LG V35 ThinQ's memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos is very similar to Motorola DROID Turbo 2's one, both have a SD extension slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB and exactly the same 64 GB internal storage capacity. The Motorola DROID Turbo 2 features a bit longer battery life than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has a 3760mAh battery size.
Although LG V35 ThinQ is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Motorola DROID Turbo 2, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Motorola DROID Turbo 2. If you are trying to save some dollars, you can buy the Motorola DROID Turbo 2, letting go some specs and features, but you will get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.