Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2015-10-29 | 2018-10-18 |
| 5.90 x 3.07 x 0.36 inches | 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Black and White | Aurora black and Moroccan blue |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | $ 204.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 544 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3760mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.68 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
LG V40 ThinQ is just a bit better than the Motorola DROID Turbo 2, with a global score of 81.2 against 75.4. LG V40 ThinQ is a thinner cellphone than the Motorola DROID Turbo 2, but both of them have equal weights. LG V40 ThinQ features a little bit better performance than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the LG V40 ThinQ also has a greater amount of RAM.
The LG V40 ThinQ features a little sharper display than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, because although it has a little lower count of pixels per inch of display, it also counts with a bigger screen and a quite better 1440 x 3120 resolution. The LG V40 ThinQ counts with just a bit better camera than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, because although it has a lot worse 12 megapixels resolution back facing camera and a lower (4K) video definition, it also counts with a way larger diafragm aperture to capture better low-light images and video.
The LG V40 ThinQ's storage to install games and applications is very similar to Motorola DROID Turbo 2's one, both of them have the same 64 GB internal memory capacity and an external memory card slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. Motorola DROID Turbo 2 counts with just a little bit longer battery duration than LG V40 ThinQ, because it has 3760mAh of battery capacity instead of 3300mAh.
LG V40 ThinQ is a lot more expensive than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, but you can get a better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.