Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| 2015-10-29 | 2020-05-15 |
| 5.90 x 3.07 x 0.36 inches | 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Black and White | Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | $ 264.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.4 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 544 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.5 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3760mAh Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.68 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG Velvet has a general score of 87.1, which is better than Motorola DROID Turbo 2's 75.4 general score. The LG Velvet construction is extremely newer and somewhat thinner than the Motorola DROID Turbo 2's, but it's also just a little bit heavier. The Motorola DROID Turbo 2 has a little bit better screen than LG Velvet, because although it has a really smaller display, it also counts with a higher pixels amount in each inch of screen and a little bit higher 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution.
The LG Velvet counts with a better storage capacity for apps and games than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, and although they both have a slot for external memory cards that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB, the LG Velvet also has 128 GB internal storage capacity. LG Velvet features just a little better hardware performance than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the LG Velvet also has 3 GB more RAM.
The LG Velvet takes much better pictures and videos than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, and although they both have the same video quality and the same video frame rate, the LG Velvet also has a bigger aperture to take better low-light photos and videos and a lot more MP back facing camera. LG Velvet has a little better battery lifetime than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, because it has a 14 percent more battery capacity.
LG Velvet costs a lot more than the Motorola DROID Turbo 2, but you can get a better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.