Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2015-10-29 | 2024-04-16 |
| 5.90 x 3.07 x 0.36 inches | 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Black and White | Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) |
| -- | Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 544 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.79 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.5 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3760mAh Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.68 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is much better than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, with an 87.1 score against 75.4. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra construction is noticeably newer and just a little bit thinner, but also somewhat heavier than the Motorola DROID Turbo 2. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a better looking display than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, because although it has a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a lot lower count of pixels per inch of display, it also counts with a larger display.
The Motorola DROID Turbo 2 has an extremely better processor than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a much bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 448 GB more internal storage capacity.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with improved battery duration than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra takes a lot better photos and videos than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also has faster video frame rate, a bigger camera aperture and a much better 50 mega-pixels resolution back-facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.