Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| -- | Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2015-10-29 | 2016-09-01 |
| 5.90 x 3.07 x 0.36 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Black and White | Black, Gold and Gray |
| $ 135.00 | $ 250.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.4 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 544 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.5 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3760mAh Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.68 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Moto Z Force is a bit better than the Motorola DROID Turbo 2, having a score of 75.8 against 75.4. The Moto Z Force body is newer, just a bit lighter and way thinner than Motorola DROID Turbo 2. The Motorola DROID Turbo 2 features a little bit better hardware performance than Moto Z Force, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM, it also counts with a larger number of cores (although slower).
The Motorola DROID Turbo 2 features a bit more vivid screen than Motorola Moto Z Force, because although it has a bit smaller screen, and they both have the same resolution of 1440 x 2560, the Motorola DROID Turbo 2 also counts with a just a little higher pixels density. Moto Z Force captures a bit better photographs and videos than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, and although they both have the same video definition, the same 30 fps video frame rate and a 21 megapixels camera, the Moto Z Force also has a larger aperture to take better low light captures and video.
The Moto Z Force counts with as much storage capacity to store more games and applications as the Motorola DROID Turbo 2, they have exactly the same 64 GB internal storage capacity and a SD card slot that admits up to 1,95 TB. The Motorola DROID Turbo 2 features just a bit longer battery life than Moto Z Force, because it has a 3760mAh battery size.
Although Moto Z Force is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Motorola DROID Turbo 2, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Motorola DROID Turbo 2. If you want to save a few dollars, you can get the Motorola DROID Turbo 2, and give up a couple features and specs, but you'll get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.