Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| -- | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2015-10-29 | 2018-08-16 |
| 5.90 x 3.07 x 0.36 inches | 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Black and White | 16 777 216 |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | $ 297.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.4 inches | 6 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 544 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3760mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.68 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Moto Z3 has a score of 77.6, which is a bit better than Motorola DROID Turbo 2's score of 75.4. Motorola Moto Z3 is a much newer device, and it is also a little lighter and noticeably thinner than the Motorola DROID Turbo 2. Moto Z3 has a bit more powerful processor than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Moto Z3 also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
The Motorola DROID Turbo 2 has a slightly better looking display than Moto Z3, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 and more pixels per inch of screen. Moto Z3's memory to install applications and games is very similar to the Motorola DROID Turbo 2 one, both of them have a SD extension slot that supports up to 1,95 TB and equal internal memory capacity.
The Motorola DROID Turbo 2 counts with longer battery performance than Motorola Moto Z3, because it has 3760mAh of battery capacity. The Motorola DROID Turbo 2 features a slightly better camera than Moto Z3, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the same video frame rates and a F2 diafragm aperture, the Motorola DROID Turbo 2 also has a much better 21 megapixels resolution camera.
Although Moto Z3 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Motorola DROID Turbo 2, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Motorola DROID Turbo 2. So if you want that extra specs and features, you can buy Moto Z3, otherwise you can save a couple dollars and buy the Motorola DROID Turbo 2, giving up a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.