Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2015-10-29 | 2019-12-04 |
| 5.90 x 3.07 x 0.36 inches | 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Black and White | Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid |
| -- | Plastic |
| $ 135.00 | $ 350.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 544 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3760mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.68 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola One Hyper has an overall score of 79.8, which is just a bit better than Motorola DROID Turbo 2's 75.4 overall score. Even though Motorola One Hyper is somewhat heavier than the Motorola DROID Turbo 2, it's just a bit thinner and also newer. Motorola One Hyper has a CPU that's very similar to the processing unit in Motorola DROID Turbo 2, and although the Motorola One Hyper has a larger amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 cores.
The Motorola DROID Turbo 2 counts with a bit sharper display than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2560px and a better display density. Motorola One Hyper counts with slightly more storage capacity for apps and games than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, because although it has an external memory slot that allows 1000 GB smaller, it also counts with 64 GB more internal memory.
Motorola One Hyper has a little better battery lifetime than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3760mAh. The Motorola One Hyper counts with a better camera than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same video frame rates, the Motorola One Hyper also has a back facing camera with a lot higher 64 mega-pixels resolution and a bigger camera aperture for better captures and videos in poorly lited environments.
Although Motorola One Hyper is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Motorola DROID Turbo 2, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Motorola DROID Turbo 2. If you want to save some money, you can get Motorola DROID Turbo 2, letting go a few specs and features, but you'll get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.