Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| 2015-10-29 | 2019-09-05 |
| 5.90 x 3.07 x 0.36 inches | 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Black and White | Brushed bronze, Cosmic purple and Electric gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | $ 450.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 544 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 12.42 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3760mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.68 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola One Zoom is just a bit better than the Motorola DROID Turbo 2, getting an 80 score against 75.4. Motorola One Zoom's design is newer and just a bit thinner, but also somewhat heavier than Motorola DROID Turbo 2. Motorola One Zoom features a CPU that's just as good as the processor in Motorola DROID Turbo 2, and although the Motorola One Zoom has more RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor.
The Motorola DROID Turbo 2 features a little sharper display than Motorola One Zoom, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a greater count of pixels per inch of screen and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels. Motorola DROID Turbo 2 has a greater storage for games and applications than Motorola One Zoom, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Motorola One Zoom features a bit longer battery life than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, because it has a 4000mAh battery size instead of 3760mAh. Motorola One Zoom has a much better camera than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Motorola One Zoom also has a camera in the back with a way better resolution and a bigger aperture.
Although Motorola One Zoom is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Motorola DROID Turbo 2, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Motorola DROID Turbo 2. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy Motorola One Zoom, else you can save some dollars and get the Motorola DROID Turbo 2, resigning some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.