Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 87 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2015-10-29 | 2020-10-02 |
| 5.90 x 3.07 x 0.36 inches | 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Black and White | Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| $ 135.00 | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.4 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2142 x 876 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 544 pixels per inch | 373 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.5 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3760mAh Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.68 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola razr (2020) is better than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, having a global score of 87 against 75.4. The Motorola razr (2020) is a a lot newer and somewhat thinner cellphone than the Motorola DROID Turbo 2, although it's also somewhat heavier. Motorola DROID Turbo 2 has a much better screen than Motorola razr (2020), because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better pixel amount in each inch in the screen and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px.
Motorola razr (2020) features a bit superior processing unit than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Motorola razr (2020) also has a greater amount of RAM memory. Motorola DROID Turbo 2 features a quite bigger storage to store more apps and games than Motorola razr (2020), because although it has just 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Motorola razr (2020) captures much clearer photos and videos than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the Motorola razr (2020) also has a back camera with way more mega pixels and a larger camera aperture to capture better low light photography and videos.
The Motorola DROID Turbo 2 features improved battery duration than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a 3760mAh battery capacity against 2800mAh.
Although Motorola razr (2020) is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Motorola DROID Turbo 2, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Motorola DROID Turbo 2. So if you need that extra specs, you can buy the Motorola razr (2020), else you can save some dollars and get the Motorola DROID Turbo 2, letting go a couple features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.