Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 80.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Nokia |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2015-10-29 | 2021-07-29 |
| 5.90 x 3.07 x 0.36 inches | 6.76 x 3.21 x 0.42 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 10.02 ounces |
| Black and White | Granite Gre and Ultra Blue |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | $ 550.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | -- |
| 544 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 550 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 SM4350 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 460 Gold, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 9.79 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.5 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3760mAh Battery | 4630mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.68 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Nokia XR20 is a bit better than the Motorola DROID Turbo 2, with a score of 80.8 against 75.4. Nokia XR20's construction is way newer, but noticeably heavier and thicker than Motorola DROID Turbo 2. The Nokia XR20 has a bit more powerful processing unit than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Nokia XR20 also has a larger amount of RAM.
The Motorola DROID Turbo 2 features just a bit better looking screen than Nokia XR20, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2560px and a greater pixel density. Nokia XR20 shoots better pictures and videos than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, and although they both have the same (Full HD) video quality, the Nokia XR20 also has higher 60 frames per second video frame rates, a bigger camera aperture to capture better photography and videos in low light environments and a back facing camera with a lot higher resolution.
Motorola DROID Turbo 2 has slightly more memory capacity for apps and games than Nokia XR20, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a SD memory slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. Nokia XR20 counts with longer battery life than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, because it has a 23 percent more battery size.
Although Nokia XR20 is a better device, it is way more expensive than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Motorola DROID Turbo 2. If you want to save some dollars, you can get the Motorola DROID Turbo 2, letting go a few features and specs, but you'll get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.