Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2015-10-29 | 2020-04-27 |
| 5.90 x 3.07 x 0.36 inches | 6.27 x 2.88 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Black and White | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush red and Prism Crush white |
| -- | Plastic |
| $ 135.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 544 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | MediaTek Helio P65 MT6768 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 9.79 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3760mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.68 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A31 is just a bit better than the Motorola DROID Turbo 2, getting an 81.3 score against 75.4. Even though Galaxy A31 is just a little heavier than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, it's just a little bit thinner and newer. Motorola DROID Turbo 2 has a bit more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy A31, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px and more pixels per inch in the screen.
The Motorola DROID Turbo 2 features a much bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A31, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal storage capacity, the Motorola DROID Turbo 2 also has a SD card slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Galaxy A31's processor is just as good as Motorola DROID Turbo 2's processing unit, and although the Galaxy A31 has 1 GB more RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
The Galaxy A31 features greater battery lifetime than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3760mAh. Galaxy A31 shoots much clearer photographs and videos than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, and although they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video resolution, a F2 aperture and the same video frame rate, the Galaxy A31 also has a lot higher 48 mega-pixels resolution back camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.