Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 82 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2015-10-29 | 2021-02-25 |
| 5.90 x 3.07 x 0.36 inches | 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | -- |
| Black and White | Awesome Black, Awesome Blue and Awesome Violet and Awesome White |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| $ 135.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 544 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Mediatek Helio G80 MT6769T chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Cortex-A75, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 GPU | Mali G52 MC2 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 9.79 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3760mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.68 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A32 LTE Only is a bit better than the Motorola DROID Turbo 2, with an 82 score against 75.4. The Samsung Galaxy A32 LTE Only is a incredibly newer cellphone, and it's also a little bit thinner and way lighter than the Motorola DROID Turbo 2. The Galaxy A32 LTE Only and Motorola DROID Turbo 2 have similar CPUs, and although the Galaxy A32 LTE Only has 1 GB more RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
The Galaxy A32 LTE Only has a slightly better looking display than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, because although it has a little worse amount of pixels per screen inch and a bit worse 1080 x 2400 resolution, it also counts with a bigger screen. Motorola DROID Turbo 2 features a better memory to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A32 LTE Only, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal memory, the Motorola DROID Turbo 2 also has a SD memory slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Samsung Galaxy A32 LTE Only has superior battery performance than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity. The Galaxy A32 LTE Only counts with just a bit better camera than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same 1920x1080 video quality, the Galaxy A32 LTE Only also has a larger aperture and a back camera with way more MP.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.