Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 79.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2015-10-29 | 2024-03-11 |
| 5.90 x 3.07 x 0.36 inches | 6.37 x 3.07 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Black and White | -- |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.4 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 544 pixels per inch | 390 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Exynos 1380 (5 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 GPU | Mali-G68 MP5 GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.51 inches (1/1.96") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.79 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.5 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3760mAh Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.68 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A35 5G is slightly better than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, getting a 79.4 score against 75.4. Galaxy A35 5G's design is extremely newer and thinner than Motorola DROID Turbo 2's, but it is also heavier. The Motorola DROID Turbo 2 has a much faster processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, although it has less RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
Motorola DROID Turbo 2 has a bit better screen than Galaxy A35 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher display pixels density and a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution. The Motorola DROID Turbo 2 counts with a much better memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy A35 5G, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Galaxy A35 5G shoots much clearer videos and photos than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Galaxy A35 5G also has a larger camera aperture for better low light photography and videos and a back facing camera with much more mega pixels.
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G counts with greater battery duration than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.