Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 79.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2015-10-29 | 2019-04-10 |
| 5.90 x 3.07 x 0.36 inches | 5.69 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 4.94 ounces |
| Black and White | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.4 inches | 5.9 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 544 pixels per inch | 437 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Exynos 7904 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9.09 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 9.79 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3760mAh Battery | 3100mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.68 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A40 is just a bit better than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, getting a score of 79.6 against 75.4. The Galaxy A40 is a incredibly newer phone, and it's also lighter and somewhat thinner than the Motorola DROID Turbo 2. The Motorola DROID Turbo 2 has a bit faster CPU than Samsung Galaxy A40, although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
The Motorola DROID Turbo 2 has a slightly better looking screen than Galaxy A40, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a just a bit greater pixel density and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels. The Motorola DROID Turbo 2 features a much better memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy A40, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal memory, the Motorola DROID Turbo 2 also has a slot for external memory cards that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Motorola DROID Turbo 2 features a slightly better camera than Galaxy A40, because although it has a smaller aperture, it also counts with a lot better (4K) video definition and a lot more mega-pixels camera. Motorola DROID Turbo 2 has better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A40, because it has 3760mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.