Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 86.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2015-10-29 | 2019-10-20 |
| 5.90 x 3.07 x 0.36 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Black and White | Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 544 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 13.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3760mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.68 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A50s is much better than the Motorola DROID Turbo 2, getting a general score of 86.6 against 75.4. The Samsung Galaxy A50s construction is way newer, just a little bit lighter and thinner than Motorola DROID Turbo 2. Samsung Galaxy A50s has a bit more powerful processor than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, and although they both have 8 cores, the Samsung Galaxy A50s also has more RAM.
Motorola DROID Turbo 2 counts with a bit better looking screen than Galaxy A50s, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2560px and a better display pixels density. Motorola DROID Turbo 2 has slightly more storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy A50s, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD extension slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Samsung Galaxy A50s counts with a much better camera than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, and although they both have a F2 aperture, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Samsung Galaxy A50s also has a way more MP camera in the back. The Samsung Galaxy A50s features a bit better battery life than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, because it has a 6 percent bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.