Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| 2015-10-29 | 2021-03-17 |
| 5.90 x 3.07 x 0.36 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Black and White | -- |
| -- | Plastic |
| $ 135.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 544 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.5 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3760mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.68 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52 is much better than the Motorola DROID Turbo 2, getting a 90.7 score against 75.4. Galaxy A52's design is newer and just a bit thinner than Motorola DROID Turbo 2's, although it's heavier. Galaxy A52 features a bit faster CPU than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy A52 also has a higher amount of RAM.
The Motorola DROID Turbo 2 counts with a bit better display than Galaxy A52, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels and more pixels per inch in the display. Galaxy A52 has a much better camera than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same video frame rates, the Galaxy A52 also has a bigger aperture and a back-facing camera with lot more mega pixels.
The Galaxy A52 counts with a slightly better memory for applications and games than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, because although it has an external memory card slot that admits 976 GB smaller, it also counts with 64 GB more internal memory. Samsung Galaxy A52 has greater battery life than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, because it has a 20% larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.