Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 12, 11 |
| 2015-10-29 | 2021-03-19 |
| 5.90 x 3.07 x 0.36 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Black and White | -- |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 544 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.5 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3760mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.68 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has a global score of 91.3, which is much better than Motorola DROID Turbo 2's 75.4 general score. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G's design is noticeably newer and just a little thinner, but heavier than the Motorola DROID Turbo 2. Motorola DROID Turbo 2 has a bit sharper display than Galaxy A52 5G, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution and a greater pixel number per inch of screen.
Galaxy A52 5G has just a bit bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, because although it has a slot for external memory cards that holds a maximum of 1 TB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory capacity. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G counts with a bit better hardware performance than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G also has a higher amount of RAM.
The Galaxy A52 5G features superior battery performance than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity against 3760mAh. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G features a lot better camera than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same video frame rates, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G also has a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better images in low-light environments and a way higher resolution camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.