Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 91.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2015-10-29 | 2021-09-01 |
| 5.90 x 3.07 x 0.36 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Black and White | Awesome Black, Awesome Mint, Awesome Violet and Awesome White |
| -- | Plastic |
| $ 135.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 544 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 670, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.5 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3760mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.68 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A52s is way better than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, having a 91.1 score against 75.4. Although the Galaxy A52s is heavier than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, it's just a little thinner and much newer. The Motorola DROID Turbo 2 has a little more vivid display than Galaxy A52s, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a higher screen pixel density and a better 1440 x 2560 resolution.
The Galaxy A52s counts with a bit superior processing unit than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy A52s also has a greater amount of RAM. Galaxy A52s has just a bit more storage capacity for games and applications than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, because although it has a SD memory card expansion slot that admits up to 1 TB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy A52s counts with longer battery life than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, because it has a 20% larger battery size. Galaxy A52s shoots greater photos and videos than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same video definition, the Galaxy A52s also has a back facing camera with a lot higher 64 megapixels resolution and a larger camera aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.