Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| 2015-10-29 | 2017-01-13 |
| 5.90 x 3.07 x 0.36 inches | 6.17 x 3.06 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Black and White | Black sky, Blue mist, Gold sand and Peach cloud |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.4 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 544 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 GPU | Mali-T830 MP3 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 8.88 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 9.79 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3760mAh Battery | 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.68 | 5.6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A7 (2017) is just a bit better than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, getting a general score of 75.8 against 75.4. Even though the Galaxy A7 (2017) is just a little heavier than the Motorola DROID Turbo 2, it's thinner and also newer. The Motorola DROID Turbo 2 has a much better display than Galaxy A7 (2017), because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution and a better quantity of pixels per inch in the screen.
The Motorola DROID Turbo 2 features a way bigger storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy A7 (2017), because it has a slot for an external memory card that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB and 64 GB internal memory capacity. Motorola DROID Turbo 2 features a bit faster processor than Galaxy A7 (2017). They have the same RAM amount and the same number of cores.
Motorola DROID Turbo 2 captures a bit better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2017), because although it has a smaller aperture which is not good for taking photos and videos in poorly lited environments, it also counts with a back camera with a much better resolution and a way better 3840x2160 (4K) video definition.
The Motorola DROID Turbo 2 has a little better battery life than Galaxy A7 (2017), because it has a 3760mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.