Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 76.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2015-10-29 | 2019-04-26 |
| 5.90 x 3.07 x 0.36 inches | 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black and White | Black, Blue, Pink and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 544 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 3.52 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3760mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.68 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A70 has a general score of 76.9, which is a little bit better than the Motorola DROID Turbo 2's 75.4 general score. Samsung Galaxy A70 is a extremely newer and thinner phone than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, but it's a bit heavier. The Motorola DROID Turbo 2 features a little more vivid screen than Galaxy A70, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a better pixels density and a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution.
The Motorola DROID Turbo 2 features a little bit more storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A70, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that allows up to 1,95 TB. Galaxy A70 features a bit faster processor than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy A70 also has a larger amount of RAM.
The Motorola DROID Turbo 2 captures much clearer photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy A70, although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not recommended for shooting photos and video in low-light environments, they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same (4K) video definition.
Galaxy A70 counts with superior battery lifetime than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, because it has a 20% more battery size.
Although Galaxy A70 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Motorola DROID Turbo 2. So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy Galaxy A70, otherwise you can save some money and buy the Motorola DROID Turbo 2, giving up some specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.