Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 92.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2015-10-29 | 2020-07-16 |
| 5.90 x 3.07 x 0.36 inches | 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Black and White | Prism bricks black |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | $ 650.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 544 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.5 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3760mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.68 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A71 5G UW has an overall score of 92.9, which is a lot better than the Motorola DROID Turbo 2's global score of 75.4. The Galaxy A71 5G UW body is way newer and a little thinner, but also heavier than Motorola DROID Turbo 2. Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with just a bit better performance than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy A71 5G UW also has 5 GB more RAM.
The Motorola DROID Turbo 2 features a little more vivid display than Galaxy A71 5G UW, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with more pixels per inch in the display and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560px. The Galaxy A71 5G UW features a greater camera than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Galaxy A71 5G UW also has a larger camera aperture for better low light photography and video and a back-facing camera with a lot higher resolution.
Galaxy A71 5G UW features a little bit more storage capacity for apps and games than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, because although it has a slot for an external memory card that supports a maximum of 1000 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with more internal memory. Galaxy A71 5G UW has superior battery performance than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, because it has a 20% more battery capacity.
Although Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Motorola DROID Turbo 2, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Motorola DROID Turbo 2. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW, otherwise you can save some dollars and get the Motorola DROID Turbo 2, resigning some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.