Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 85.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2015-10-29 | 2020-10-16 |
| 5.90 x 3.07 x 0.36 inches | 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Black and White | Fusion black, Fusion blue and Fusion green |
| $ 135.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 544 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| -- | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3760mAh Battery | 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.68 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy F41 is much better than the Motorola DROID Turbo 2, getting a global score of 85.2 against 75.4. The Samsung Galaxy F41 body is extremely newer and just a bit thinner, but somewhat heavier than Motorola DROID Turbo 2. The Samsung Galaxy F41 has just a bit better performance than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Samsung Galaxy F41 also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
Motorola DROID Turbo 2 has a bit sharper display than Galaxy F41, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2560 and a higher pixels quantity in each inch of screen. The Motorola DROID Turbo 2 has a much bigger storage capacity for apps and games than Galaxy F41, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal storage, the Motorola DROID Turbo 2 also has a SD extension slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Samsung Galaxy F41 has a much longer battery life than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, because it has a 6000mAh battery capacity instead of 3760mAh. The Galaxy F41 features a very superior camera than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Galaxy F41 also has a lot more mega pixels camera and a bigger aperture to take better photos and videos in low light environments.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.