Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2015-10-29 | 2021-02-22 |
| 5.90 x 3.07 x 0.36 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 7.69 ounces |
| Black and White | Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey |
| $ 135.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 544 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Exynos 9825 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 GPU | ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.79 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3760mAh Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.68 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy F62 is better than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, getting an 88.1 score against 75.4. Samsung Galaxy F62's construction is a lot newer than the Motorola DROID Turbo 2's, although it is a little bit thicker and heavier. Samsung Galaxy F62 counts with just a little better hardware performance than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, because although it has an inferior number of cores , it also counts with a larger amount of RAM memory.
The Motorola DROID Turbo 2 features a bit better looking screen than Galaxy F62, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a higher pixel number in each inch in the screen and a higher 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution. Galaxy F62 features a slightly better memory capacity to store more games and applications than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, because although it has a slot for SD memory cards that supports 976 GB smaller, it also counts with 64 GB more internal storage capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy F62 shoots way better photographs and videos than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Samsung Galaxy F62 also has a camera in the back with lot more mega-pixels and a bigger camera aperture to capture better photos and videos in low-light environments.
The Galaxy F62 has a superior battery lifetime than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, because it has a 7000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.