Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 97.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2015-10-29 | 2019-09-27 |
| 5.90 x 3.07 x 0.36 inches | 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 9.74 ounces |
| Black and White | Cosmos black and Space silver |
| $ 135.00 | $ 1980.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.4 inches | 7.3 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2152 x 1536 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 544 pixels per inch | 362 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.5 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3760mAh Battery | 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.68 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Fold is way better than the Motorola DROID Turbo 2, having a score of 97.6 against 75.4. The Samsung Galaxy Fold body is incredibly newer and thinner, but extremely heavier than Motorola DROID Turbo 2. Motorola DROID Turbo 2 features a bit more vivid screen than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a really smaller display, it also counts with a slightly better resolution of 1440 x 2560px and a lot better pixel density.
The Samsung Galaxy Fold has a superior storage capacity to install games and applications than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with more internal memory capacity. The Galaxy Fold has a little faster processor than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Galaxy Fold also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
Galaxy Fold features a little longer battery duration than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, because it has 4380mAh of battery capacity. The Samsung Galaxy Fold shoots a little bit better pictures and videos than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, because although it has a worse video definition and a back facing camera with a lot lower resolution, it also counts with a lot larger camera aperture for better captures and videos in low-light situations.
Although Samsung Galaxy Fold is a better device, it costs a lot more than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Motorola DROID Turbo 2. So if you need that extra specs, you can buy the Samsung Galaxy Fold, otherwise you can save some money and get the Motorola DROID Turbo 2, letting go a couple features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.