Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 84.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2015-10-29 | 2020-03-23 |
| 5.90 x 3.07 x 0.36 inches | 6.26 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Black and White | Midnight blue and Raven black |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 544 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| -- | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Exynos 9611 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3760mAh Battery | 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.68 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy M21 has a score of 84.1, which is much better than Motorola DROID Turbo 2's 75.4 global score. The Galaxy M21 design is a lot newer and a little thinner, but somewhat heavier than Motorola DROID Turbo 2. Motorola DROID Turbo 2 has just a bit better display than Galaxy M21, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2560px and a higher pixel density.
The Motorola DROID Turbo 2 features a way bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy M21, and although they both have equal internal storage capacity, the Motorola DROID Turbo 2 also has a SD extension slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. Galaxy M21 features a bit better hardware performance than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy M21 also has a larger amount of RAM.
The Samsung Galaxy M21 features a superior camera than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, and although they both have the same video frame rates, a same size aperture and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Samsung Galaxy M21 also has a back camera with a lot higher 48 megapixels resolution. The Galaxy M21 counts with a really longer battery lifetime than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.