Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 87.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2015-10-29 | 2020-09-11 |
| 5.90 x 3.07 x 0.36 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 7.51 ounces |
| Black and White | Black and White |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 544 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.79 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3760mAh Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.68 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy M51 has an overall score of 87.7, which is much better than the Motorola DROID Turbo 2's 75.4 score. Even though the Samsung Galaxy M51 is a lot newer than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, it is a little thicker and noticeably heavier. Galaxy M51 counts with a little bit better hardware performance than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Galaxy M51 also has 3 GB more RAM.
Motorola DROID Turbo 2 has just a bit better display than Samsung Galaxy M51, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a better pixels density and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px. Motorola DROID Turbo 2 features a little bit more storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy M51, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Galaxy M51 shoots greater photos and videos than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Galaxy M51 also has a much better resolution back camera and a bigger aperture to capture better low-light images and video.
The Galaxy M51 counts with a much longer battery performance than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, because it has an 86% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.