Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2015-10-29 | 2020-08-21 |
| 5.90 x 3.07 x 0.36 inches | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Black and White | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.4 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 544 pixels per inch | 494 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.5 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3760mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.68 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a general score of 98.9, which is way better than Motorola DROID Turbo 2's 75.4 overall score. Although the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is somewhat heavier than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, it's somewhat thinner and noticeably newer. Motorola DROID Turbo 2 and Galaxy Note 20 Ultra feature really similar screens, because although the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a just a bit lower pixels count in each display inch, it also counts with a bigger display and a slightly higher 1440 x 3088 resolution.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features just a bit more memory for apps and games than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, because although it has an external memory slot that allows up to 1000 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory capacity. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features just a little better performance than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra captures greater photographs and videos than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, because it has a lot better 7680x4320 video resolution, a back facing camera with a lot higher resolution and a bigger aperture to take better low light images and videos. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with greater battery life than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, because it has a 20 percent greater battery capacity.
Although Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Motorola DROID Turbo 2, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Motorola DROID Turbo 2. So if you need that extra specs, you can buy Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, otherwise you can save some money and buy the Motorola DROID Turbo 2, giving up a couple specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.