Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 80.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| 2015-10-29 | 2017-07-07 |
| 5.90 x 3.07 x 0.36 inches | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Black and White | Black, Blue, Gold and Silver |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | $ 611.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.4 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 544 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 GPU | Mali-T880 MP12 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.79 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3760mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.68 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note Fan Edition has a global score of 80.4, which is a bit better than the Motorola DROID Turbo 2's 75.4 general score. Galaxy Note Fan Edition is a newer cellphone, and it's also a little bit lighter and somewhat thinner than Motorola DROID Turbo 2. Motorola DROID Turbo 2 has a bit more vivid display than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, and they both have an equal 1440 x 2560 resolution, the Motorola DROID Turbo 2 also counts with a little better display density.
Galaxy Note Fan Edition features a little bit better performance than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy Note Fan Edition also has 1 GB more RAM memory. Motorola DROID Turbo 2 counts with a slightly better camera than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not nice for capturing pictures and/or video in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same (4K) video resolution, the Motorola DROID Turbo 2 also counts with a way more megapixels back camera.
Motorola DROID Turbo 2 features a much better storage for games and applications than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, and although they both have the same internal memory, the Motorola DROID Turbo 2 also has an external memory card slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. Motorola DROID Turbo 2 has just a bit longer battery performance than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has an 18 percent larger battery capacity.
Although Galaxy Note Fan Edition is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Motorola DROID Turbo 2, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Motorola DROID Turbo 2. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy Galaxy Note Fan Edition, but if you don't you can save some dollars and buy the Motorola DROID Turbo 2, giving up some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.