Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| 2015-10-29 | 2019-08-23 |
| 5.90 x 3.07 x 0.36 inches | 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Black and White | Aura black, Aura glow and Aura white |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | $ 950.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.4 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 544 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3760mAh Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.68 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note10 is better than the Motorola DROID Turbo 2, having a global score of 89 against 75.4. The Samsung Galaxy Note10 is a notably newer device, and it's also just a little bit lighter and somewhat thinner than the Motorola DROID Turbo 2. The Motorola DROID Turbo 2 counts with just a bit better screen than Galaxy Note10, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution and more pixels per inch of screen.
Galaxy Note10 counts with a bit faster processor than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy Note10 also has a greater amount of RAM. The Motorola DROID Turbo 2 has a better memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note10, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD memory slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Galaxy Note10 has just a bit better camera than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, because although it has a worse 3840x2160 video resolution and a back-facing camera with much less MP resolution, it also counts with a way bigger camera aperture. The Motorola DROID Turbo 2 features a little better battery performance than Galaxy Note10, because it has 3760mAh of battery capacity.
Although Galaxy Note10 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Motorola DROID Turbo 2, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Motorola DROID Turbo 2. If you are trying to save some money, you can get Motorola DROID Turbo 2, and give up a couple features and specs, but you'll get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.