Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 86.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2015-10-29 | 2020-01-21 |
| 5.90 x 3.07 x 0.36 inches | 6.44 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Black and White | Aura black, Aura glow and Aura red |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 544 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3760mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.68 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite is much better than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, with an 86.2 score against 75.4. The Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite construction is noticeably newer and just a little bit thinner, but heavier than the Motorola DROID Turbo 2. The Motorola DROID Turbo 2 counts with a bit more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution and a higher screen density.
The Galaxy Note10 Lite has a bit more powerful processor than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Note10 Lite also has a greater amount of RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite features a bit better camera than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, because although it has a much less megapixels resolution camera and a lower (4K) video resolution, it also counts with a bigger diafragm aperture.
Galaxy Note10 Lite counts with just a bit bigger storage capacity to store more apps and games than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, because although it has a slot for an SD memory card that supports up to 1000 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with more internal memory. The Galaxy Note10 Lite counts with better battery performance than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, because it has a 20 percent larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.